July 25, 2026

How to Compare Valve Quotations: The 10-Point Checklist

Two quotations for “the same” valve can differ by 40% — and the cheaper one is sometimes the better product. The gap is almost never dishonesty; it is unstated differences. Here is the checklist we use internally when normalizing offers for clients.

The 10-Point Comparison Checklist

  1. Design standard & edition — API 600 vs generic B16.34 gate: different wall thickness, different cost. Standards decoder here.
  2. Body material & origin — WCB is WCB, but foundry origin drives both price and approval on EPC vendor lists.
  3. Trim number — 13Cr (Trim 1/8) vs Stellite (Trim 5/16) can be 20% of valve cost. Trim codes explained.
  4. Bonnet type — bolted vs welded vs pressure-seal on small bore changes both price and leak performance.
  5. Overlays — NACE, fire-safe (API 607), low-E (ISO 15848-1), cryogenic (BS 6364): a quote silently omitting one overlay looks cheaper and fails document review later.
  6. Testing level — standard API 598/EN 12266 vs added cryo tests, PMI, witnessed inspection.
  7. Documentation — EN 10204 3.1 baseline vs 3.2 third-party; IOMs, weld maps, NDE reports. Certificate guide.
  8. Operator scope — bare stem vs handwheel vs gear vs actuator; ISO 5211 pad included or not.
  9. Delivery terms — EXW factory vs DAP site is routinely 5–10% on international orders; check packing spec for sea freight.
  10. Warranty & origin certificates — ask explicitly; retrofit paperwork after shipment is painful.

The Two-Minute Method

Build a one-line spec string for each offer — e.g. 6” 150# API 600 WCB/Trim 8, bolted bonnet, RF, API 598, 3.1, bare stem, EXW — and lay the strings side by side. Every difference becomes visible in seconds, and the “40% gap” explains itself.

The Ten Points, Expanded

Two quotations for “the same” valve rarely describe the same product. Normalise them on these ten dimensions before comparing any number:

  1. Design standard and edition. API 600, API 602, API 623, ASME B16.34, EN 1984 — and which edition. A valve built to an older edition is not automatically non-compliant, but it is not automatically equal either.
  2. Pressure class and the basis of the rating. Class 150/300/800 is not a pressure; it is a rating curve. Compare the working pressure at the actual design temperature, not the class number.
  3. Body and trim materials, by grade. “Stainless” is not a specification. WCB, CF8M, F316, F51 — and the trim number where the standard uses one.
  4. Seat type and leakage acceptance. Resilient or metal seated, and the leakage criterion with its rate letter or allowance. This single line frequently explains a large price gap.
  5. End connections and face-to-face dimensions. Flanged to which standard and facing, grooved, threaded, butt weld with what schedule — and whether the face-to-face matches the space in the drawing.
  6. Certifications actually included. API 607 fire-safe, UL/FM listing, PED/CE, NACE MR0175, ISO 15848-1 low emission. Each has a cost; each is often assumed rather than quoted.
  7. Documentation type. EN 10204 2.2, 3.1 or 3.2 — and whether test certificates, IOM manuals and dimensional drawings are included or billed.
  8. Actuation scope. Bare stem, lever, gear operator, or actuator mounted and tested. “Actuator included” and “actuator mounted, stroked and certified” are different line items.
  9. Delivery and validity. Ex-stock, made to order, or partially allocated — and how long the price holds. On metal-heavy packages a shorter validity that is honoured beats a longer one that is withdrawn.
  10. Origin and duty exposure. Country of manufacture, not country of warehouse, and whether duty is included, excluded or unstated.

How to Normalise Two Quotations in Practice

Build a single row per line item with those ten columns and fill it from both quotations. Where a supplier has left a column blank, that is the question to ask — not the price. In most comparisons the apparent gap closes substantially once certifications, documentation type and actuation scope are made explicit, and occasionally it reverses.

The remaining gap is then a real commercial difference, and it can be negotiated on its merits. A gap of 40% that survives normalisation usually means a genuinely different product, a different delivery promise, or a risk someone has not priced.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I always take the compliant-but-expensive offer?

No — ask the cheaper bidder to re-quote against the full string. If the gap survives spec alignment, negotiate with the expensive one.

Can ValveAtlas do this normalization for us?

Yes — it is a standard part of our quoting: send us competing offers with your datasheet and we return an aligned comparison plus our own bid.